Tired of all the “negativity” that mass media has been sharing with this Presidential Campaign? You know the “mainstream” media is biased (sharing “only” 2 main party candidates-Republican’s Donald Trump & Democrats’ Hillary Clinton (see views of both parties) with it’s corporate run “news”. How come they never “talk” about the 3rd party option? It’s because they are trying to “brain wash” us with the two main party system and they don’t let us know about that “other” option we have. I’ve heard that it’s a waste of a vote if we pick a 3rd party candidate…really? I don’t want to be responsible sending one of the “two” main party candidates to office.
I decided to write this after getting sick of all this political garbage being shared via social network (e.g. facebook, twitter, etc..). A “young” teenager even came over to my house opening up that he had to get out of his house because he was tired of the “fighting” (see Deep thought: This is how the “devil” is trying to divide us? goodnewseverybodycom.wordpress.com..e.g television-parents were watching the party convention) going on he saw at his parent’s house…
Think about this if we did send a 3rd party candidate to the “White House”? This will send a HUGE message to our “rich-greedy” power selfish driven corporate run elitist that “we” Americans are tired of all this “reality show-like” (e.g. Professional Wrestling) fake corrupted 2 party biased system.
Dr. Jill Stein (Massachusetts)
Presumptive Presidential Nominee
LIBERTARIAN PARTY:
Gary JohnsonBill Weld
Former Governor Gary Johnson (New Mexico)
Presidential Nominee
Former Governor Bill Weld (Massachusetts)
Vice Presidential Nominee
OTHER THIRD PARTY and INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES:
(Note: Parties with ballot status in at least one state — based on 2012 ballot status — listed first, then all others under the INDEPENDENT & WRITE-IN CANDIDATES header).
AMERICA’S PARTY / AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY:
Tom HoeflingSteve Schulin
Tom Hoefling (Iowa)
Presidential Nominee
Steve Schulin (South Carolina)
Vice Presidential Nominee
AMERICAN FREEDOM PARTY:
Bob WhitakerTom Bowie
Bob Whitaker (South Carolina)
Presidential Nominee
Tom Bowie (Maryland)
Vice Presidential Nominee
BETTER FOR AMERICA PARTY:
No Nominee Yet Designated.
CONSTITUTION PARTY OF IDAHO:
Scott CopelandJ.R. Myers
Scott Copeland (Texas)
Presidential Nominee
J.R. Myers (Alaska)
Vice Presidential Nominee
PARTY OF SOCIALISM AND LIBERATION (PSL):
Gloria LaRiva Eugene Puryear
Gloria LaRiva (California)
Presidential Nominee
Eugene Puryear (District of Columbia)
Vice Presidential Nominee
ALSO NOMINEE OF: LIBERTY UNION PARTY OF VERMONT
It was an unfortunate news with the recent headline..
Turkey downs Russian warplane near Syria border, Putin warns of ‘serious consequences
ANKARA/MOSCOW | BY TULAY KARADENIZ AND MARIA KISELYOVA 11.25.15 reuters.com ”
Turkey shot down a Russian warplane near the Syrian border on Tuesday, saying the jet had violated its air space, in one of the most serious publicly acknowledged clashes between a NATO member country and Russia for half a century.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said the plane had been attacked when it was 1 km (0.62 mile) inside Syria and warned of “serious consequences” for what he termed a stab in the back administered by “the accomplices of terrorists”.
“We will never tolerate such crimes like the one committed today,” Putin said, as Russian and Turkish shares fell on fears of an escalation between the former Cold War enemies.
In a letter to the U.N. Security Council, Turkey said it had shot down the jet while in Turkish air space. Along with a second plane, the aircraft had flown more than a mile into Turkey for 17 seconds, despite being warned 10 times in five minutes while approaching to change direction, the letter said.
“Nobody should doubt that we made our best efforts to avoid this latest incident. But everyone should respect the right of Turkey to defend its borders,” Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said in a speech in Ankara.
In condemnation of Russian air strikes in Syria, during which Turkish air space has been violated several times in recent weeks, Erdogan said that only Turkey’s “cool-headedness” had prevented worse incidents in the past.
Each country summoned a diplomatic representative of the other. Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov canceled a visit to Turkey due on Wednesday and the defense ministry said it was preparing measures to respond to such incidents.
U.S. President Barack Obama and French President Francois Hollande, meeting in Washington, urged against an escalation, while NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the military alliance stood in solidarity with Turkey.
Footage from private Turkish broadcaster Haberturk TV showed the warplane going down in flames, a long plume of smoke trailing behind it as it crashed in a wooded part of an area the TV said was known by Turks as “Turkmen Mountain”.
Separate footage from Turkey’s Anadolu Agency showed two pilots parachuting out of the jet before it crashed.
A deputy commander of rebel Turkmen forces in Syria said his men shot both pilots dead as they came down. The Russian military confirmed one pilot had been shot dead from the ground and another soldier died during a rescue operation.
A senior Turkish official said at least one of the pilots could still be alive. “It’s not a fact but a possibility. We’re trying to verify the information and taking all necessary steps to facilitate their return,” the official said.
A video sent to Reuters earlier appeared to show one of the pilots immobile and badly wounded on the ground.
“MORAL CRUSADE”
Russia’s defense ministry said one of its Su-24 fighter jets had been downed in Syria and that “for the entire duration of the flight, the aircraft was exclusively over Syrian territory”, a suggestion Turkey denied.
“The data we have is very clear. There were two planes approaching our border, we warned them as they were getting too close,” another senior Turkish official told Reuters. “Our findings show clearly that Turkish air space was violated multiple times. And they violated it knowingly.”
A U.S. military spokesman said it was an issue between the Turkish and Russian governments and that U.S.-led coalition operations in Syria and Iraq were continuing “as planned”.
Moscow’s decision to launch separate air strikes in Syria means Russian and NATO planes have been flying combat missions in the same air space for the first time since World War Two, targeting various insurgent groups close to Turkish borders.”
This incident reminds me of the many past incidents that led to various wars around the world. I pray that this incident will be a repeat of the past 😦
By Richard Sanders
Global Research, August 19, 2014
Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade (COAT) and Global Research 2 May 2002
Theme: 9/11 & ‘War on Terrorism’, Culture, Society & History, Intelligence, US NATO War Agenda
globalresearch.ca “….he anti-war movement must address the issue of the “pretext” and “justification” to wage war.
Regarding the MH17 Malaysian airline crash, is the Obama administration in the process of “creating a war pretext incident” directed against Russia as part of propaganda campaign, which could lead the World into a World War III scenario?
As documented by Richard Sanders, the War Pretext Incident strategy has been used throughout American military history.
Of relevance, the “Responsibility to Protect under a NATO “humanitarian” mandate has also been used as a thematic pretext to wage war (Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria),
The 911 Attacks and the “Global War on Terrorism” (Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan,…) not to mention the alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction” (Iraq) have also been used to justify military intervention. Both 9/11 and WMD are being heralded as a justification for waging war on Iran, based on allegation that Iran was behind the 9/11 attacks and that Iran possesses nuclear weapons.
In the words of Richard Sanders [2002]:
“It is vitally important to expose this latest attempt [9/11] to fraudulently conceal the largely economic and geostrategic purposes of war. By asking who benefits from war, we can unmask its pretense and expose the true grounds for instigating it. By throwing light on repeated historical patterns of deception, we can promote skepticism about the government and media yarns that have been spun to encourage this war.
The historical knowledge of how war planners have tricked people into supporting past wars, is like a vaccine. We can use this understanding of history to inoculate the public with healthy doses of distrust for official war pretext narratives and other deceptive stratagems. Through such immunization programs we may help to counter our society’s susceptibility to “war fever.” “…”
Let us learn from our “dark” past history , so history WON’T repeat itself. Pray for peace and spread the “good news” and shine the “good light” in this increasingly “dark” season.
Watch how the Syrian civil war became the mess it is today.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
After four-plus years of fighting, Syria’s war has killed at least 250,000 people and displaced 12 million people. And, though it started as a civil war, it’s become much more than that. It’s a proxy war that has divided much of the Middle East, and has drawn in both Russia and the United States. To understand how Syria got to this place, it helps to start at the beginning and watch it unfold:
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what’s really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com to get up to speed on everything from Kurdistan to the Kim Kardashian app. “ Physicists: Nobody’s Telling the Truth About That Downed Russian Warplane
Maddie Stone
Filed to: WAR GAMES11/28/15 4:00pm, gizmodo.com
The Secret Stupid Saudi-US Deal on Syria. Oil Gas Pipeline War
The Kerry-Abdullah Secret Deal By F. William Engdahl Global Research, March 16, 2016 Boiling Frogs Post globalresearch.ca “…The details are emerging of a new secret and quite stupid Saudi-US deal on Syria and the so-called ISIS. It involves oil and gas control of the entire region and the weakening of Russia and Iran by Saudi Arabian flooding the world market with cheap oil. Details were concluded in the September meeting by US Secretary of State John Kerry and the Saudi King. The unintended consequence will be to push Russia even faster to turn east to China and Eurasia.
One of the weirdest anomalies of the recent NATO bombing campaign, allegedly against the ISIS or IS or ISIL or Daash, depending on your preference, is the fact that with major war raging in the world’s richest oil region, the price of crude oil has been dropping, dramatically so. Since June when ISIS suddenly captured the oil-rich region of Iraq around Mosul and Kirkuk, the benchmark Brent price of crude oil dropped some 20% from $112 to about $88. World daily demand for oil has not dropped by 20% however. China oil demand has not fallen 20% nor has US domestic shale oil stock risen by 21%.
What has happened is that the long-time US ally inside OPEC, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has been flooding the market with deep discounted oil, triggering a price war within OPEC, with Iran following suit and panic selling short in oil futures markets. The Saudis are targeting sales to Asia for the discounts and in particular, its major Asian customer, China where it is reportedly offering its crude for a mere $50 to $60 a barrel rather than the earlier price of around $100. [1] That Saudi financial discounting operation in turn is by all appearance being coordinated with a US Treasury financial warfare operation, via its Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, in cooperation with a handful of inside players on Wall Street who control oil derivatives trading. The result is a market panic that is gaining momentum daily. China is quite happy to buy the cheap oil, but her close allies, Russia and Iran, are being hit severely…” Syrian War: ‘Nothing to Do With Daesh, It is Energy Battle for Future Pipelines’ Middle East 17:40 06.09.2016(updated 18:11 06.09.2016) sputniknews.com “…“Through the territories of the two cities runs a major pipeline which transports oil from Iraq to Syria, up to Idlib Governorate,” it says.
The same pipeline runs through the territory of the city of Aleppo.
…The same is true for the Syria’s western cities of Aleppo, Idlib and al-Bab. In the east, the same pipeline runs through the cities of Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor.
The oil flowing through the pipeline comes from the Iraqi city of Mosul through Sinjar on to Deir ez-Zor. Its second strand runs from the Iraqi city of al-Qaim to Deir ez-Zor, the outlet says…
The United States has no stake in the well being of Syrian civilians, despite their condemnations of Russia’s offensive in Aleppo. This is clearly shown in the fact that the people they are supporting are guilty of the same crimes they accuse Russia and Syria of: indiscriminate attacks, targeting of civilians, destruction of schools, hospitals, etc. Furthermore, the offensive in Aleppo is really no different from what the US did in Manbij, where they are said to have incorporated a “scorched earth policy” while they liberated the city from ISIS, whereby the civilian population was treated “as if they were terrorists or ISIS supporters.” Arguably their conduct was even worse, as they there earned the distinction of launching the deadliest single airstrike on civilians out of the entire 5-year conflict, massacring at least 73 where no ISIS fighters were present. The Manbij operation elicited no moral outcry from the media and punditry, understandably since these were “unworthy victims” given that they were our victims and not those of our enemies. The same can be said about the US operations in Kobani and Fallujah, whereby the entire towns were essentially reduced to rubble without any uproar.
Saudi Arabia as well has no concern for Syrian civilians, as they have been ruthlessly besieging and bombing Yemen, with the support and help of the United States, for two years without any concern for civilian lives. Their assault has led to a humanitarian situation even more dire than in Syria, leaving at least 19 million in need of humanitarian assistance; in Syria it is estimated that a total of 18 million are in need of aid.
Turkey as well is not concerned, as is evidenced by their conduct towards their Kurdish population, yet the recent quiet by Erdogan over the fate of Aleppo is indicative of an understanding reached between him with President Putin, whereby Turkey establishes a presence in northern Syria and blocks the advance of the Kurds, and in return limits its support to the rebels and the insurgents in Aleppo.
…”
Did Russia Hack the Election? WikiLeaks Said Its Source Was Not Russian
Published 6:04 pm EST, December 29, 2016 Updated 6:04 pm EST, December 29, 2016 heavy.com “..Despite a joint report released today detailing how Russia hackers may have infiltrated the Democratic party, and new sanctions imposed by President Barack Obama against Russia diplomats, WikiLeaks is maintaining that the source of its leaks was not Russia hackers. WikiLeaks was the main source of leaked information during the presidential campaign, through emails released from John Podesta’s account and the DNC.
Here’s what you need to know…”
The sources, he said, were disgusted with corruption in Clinton’s campaign and the sabotage of Bernie Sanders, Inquistr reported. Murray is a former British ambassador who was removed because of allegations of misconduct, after he was highly critical of human rights abuses in Uzbekistan.
Whether Murray’s statement is true, however, has not been established. The next day, WikiLeaks’ Twitter account stated that only Assange, Sarah Harrison, and sometimes their lawyers are authorized to speak for WikiLeaks… HERE’S THE PUBLIC EVIDENCE RUSSIA HACKED THE DNC — IT’S NOT ENOUGH
Sam Biddle
December 14 2016, 10:30 a.m. theintercept.com “..But look more closely at the above and you can’t help but notice all of the qualifying words: Possibly, appears, connects, indicates. It’s impossible (or at least dishonest) to present the evidence for Russian responsibility for hacking the Democrats without using language like this. The question, then, is this: Do we want to make major foreign policy decisions with a belligerent nuclear power based on suggestions alone, no matter how strong?
Trump: US, allies attacking Syria to stop chemical weapons Associated Press Robert Burns, Zeke Miller and Jill Colvin, Associated Press,Assoc 4.13.18 “..WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States, France and Britain together launched military strikes in Syria to punish President Bashar Assad for a suspected chemical attack against civilians and to deter him from doing it again, President Donald Trump announced Friday. Explosions lit up the skies over Damascus, the Syrian capital, as Trump announced the airstrikes from the White House…
The Syrian government has repeatedly denied any use of banned weapons.
The decision to strike, after days of deliberations, marked Trump’s second order to attack Syria; he authorized a barrage of Tomahawk cruise missiles to hit a single Syrian airfield in April 2017 in retaliation for Assad’s use of sarin gas against civilians.
Trump chastised Syria’s two main allies, Russia and Iran, for their roles in supporting “murderous dictators,” and noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin had guaranteed a 2013 international agreement for Assad to get rid of all of his chemical weapons. He called on Moscow to change course and join the West in seeking a more responsible regime in Damascus…
President Donald Trump made the decision to bomb Damascus in Syria “in response” to the supposed chemical attacks that Bashar al-Assad. When it comes to the Military Industrial Complex, meet the new President, same as the last President and the President before him, and the President before him…
Your support is essential to Freedomain Radio, which is 100% funded by viewers like you. Please support the show by making a one time donation or signing up for a monthly recurring donation at: http://www.freedomainradio.com/donate..”
ISIS responsible of chemical attack on Syria?
What other ways can we spread peace to these nations and other on-going conflicts in the world today? Any suggestions, comments, feedback, etc.. on any of the content above or wasn’t mentioned?
We are approaching “another” Presidential campaign this coming year in our nation, which the media has already “advertised” their personal candidates. Who do you think is going to win based on what’s been shown so far?
It’s pretty much obvious the Presidential Campaign is “rigged” or “set-up” with the only 2-party system that gets all the media “publicizing”. You ever hear about the 3rd, 4th, etc.. parties? They never get much attention. Why is that?
“…Elections funded primarily by wealthy, white donors mean that candidates as a whole are less likely to prioritize the needs of people of color; and that candidates of color are less likely to run for elected office, raise less money when they do, and are less likely to win. Ultimately, people of color are not adequately represented by elected officials. ..”
Declared Democratic Party Presidential Candidates , from 2016.democratic-candidates.org DEMOCRATIC PARTY: politics1.com Presidential candidates, 2016 from ballotpedia.org “Declared Lincoln Chafee Hillary Clinton Martin O’Malley Bernie Sanders Jim Webb Possible Joe Biden Andrew Cuomo Kirsten Gillibrand Amy Klobuchar Dennis Kucinich Brian Schweitzer Mark Warner Declined to run Elizabeth Warren”
Gut recherchierter Dokumentarfilm, mittels dessen Leute erkären, warum sie nicht besonders scharf darauf sind, Hilary Rodham Clinton als zukünftige Präsidentin zu bekommen.
Gegen Hilary ist Bundesmutti eine nette ältere Dame.
Western Journalism Our very own Tom Hinchey says Hillary is “looking more like a mob boss than a president.” Find out why: SHOCKING: Author Peter Schweizer says he’s had to hire full-time security since releasing his controversial new book, which questions millions in foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state. MUST READ: http://go.cbn.com/34 Will Hillary be able to recover from this campaign firestorm? Clinton Foundation Gets Millions In Exchange For Uranium Deal – News Brief </a., from youtube.com
“Published on Apr 24, 2015
Hillary Clinton recently launched her presidential campaign promising to be champion for the middle class yet she seems to be more of a champion of herself and foreign governments by accepting hundreds of millions of dollars in donations to her piggy bank – The Clinton Foundation. Canadian businessman Frank JEW-STRA along with Bill and Hillary Clinton were part of a group that built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One. The Russian government controls Uranium One and now controls 20 percent of America’s uranium supply which it can sell to other countries who are our bitter enemies like Iran. This jeopardizes both our national and energy security. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had to be involved in the approval of Uranium One’s sale to Russia.”
FBN’s Charles Payne, A&G Capital CIO Hilary Kramer, Tea Party News Network News Director Scottie Nell Hughes and FNC contributors Monica Crowley and Juan Williams on the mounting scrutiny over Clinton Foundation donations.
Watch Charles Payne talk about Elections on Making Money With Cpayne.”
Bill Clinton’s foundation set up a fundraising arm in Sweden that collected $26 million in donations at the same time that country was lobbying Hillary Clinton’s State Department to forgo sanctions that threatened its thriving business with Iran, according to interviews and documents obtained by The Washington Times… (June 02 2015)..”
2016 Needs a Third Party thedailybeast.com “….But there’s one traditional sign of the season that has yet to appear: the emergence of a movement for an independent or third party presidential run. At a time when discontent with politics as usual is peaking, and when the structural barriers to a third-party run have effectively disappeared, the silence is deafening and in sharp contrast to the previous cycles..
Those efforts were fueled by a conviction that Americans are highly discontent with the two-party system. This is something polls showed eight years ago, four years—and now. Last September, Gallup reported that 58 percent of Americans want an alternative to the two parties; about the same percentage did back in 2007 and 2011. Moreover, 67 percent of Americans now say they’re comfortable with voting for an independent presidential candidate. A record high percentage of Americans identify themselves as independent (there’s less here than meets the eye, as I’ll explain in a moment), and nearly two-thirds of Americans say they are dissatisfied with the way our government works….”
Keep coming back to this blog as I’ll continue to update the “news” until the 2016 Presidential Election. Feel free to share your thoughts or any insights that may help other readers learn more on the topics covered above.
“Politics in America today is identical to pro wrestling. And what I mean by that is in front of the cameras and the public we all hate each other, I’m gonna kick my opponent’s butt, I’m gonna wail him from here to high-water and beat the crap out of him, yet behind the scenes, we’re all friends, going out to dinner, it’s all work, it’s show biz, and that’s what you have today in politics, the Democrats and Republicans aren’t really opposed to each other. “
*more The Obama Deception HQ Full length version
“..Bill Clinton asked Donald Trump to run against his wife for the presidency then bungled an attempt to end the investigation into her emails, a new book about her failed presidential campaign reveals.
In Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling, author and New York Times journalist Amy Chozick paints Bill Clinton as a liability who contributed to her loss against her Republican rival.
It claims that Bill ‘causally encouraged’ Trump to run less than a year before the 2016 presidential campaign began.
The two men were golfing together and Bill thought Trump’s candidacy ‘would roil the Republican field’…”
George W. Bush and Michelle Obama: An unlikely friendship
CNN
Published on Mar 2, 2017
Former President George W. Bush and Michelle Obama are surprisingly close considering their political differences, and the 43rd president credits the former first lady’s appreciation for his sense of humor as a key reason.
Vermont House candidates end forum by singing duet Tom Garris Reporter mynbc5.com “CAMBRIDGE, Vt. —
Two newcomer candidates vying for the same Vermont House seat in Cambridge and Waterville may represent different political parties, but they ended a recent forum on the same tune.
Republican Zachary Mayo and Democrat Lucy Rogers banded together to end last week’s forum in song.
“Society, you’re a crazy breed,” they sang in unison.
Rogers was on cello while Mayo was strumming an acoustic guitar.
The pair describe themselves as moderates, agreeing on a number of issues, but wanting to show that that nation’s current political division shouldn’t be put above respect.
“We can find a deeper connection and that’s what’s really important here, and in this case it was music,” Mayo said.
Rogers first came up with the idea, and Mayo chose the song.
“I think it’s bigger than the both of us, and a lot of it has to do with being from a really special community that I’m glad to call my home,” Rogers said.
They’re competing for an open seat left by a retiring representative. Both focus on the small town’s need to upkeep infrastructure among other issues.
“I keep pushing people to remind people that there’s a two-hour debate prior to the clip of us playing our duet, because I think for me, … the important part is the meat of the issues and recognizing that both of us are here as serious candidates,” Rogers said.